<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Balloon Tract(k) Controversy Hits the Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://talkingtech.net/2006/02/16/balloon-tractk-controversy-hits-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://talkingtech.net/2006/02/16/balloon-tractk-controversy-hits-the-web/</link>
	<description>life and technology on the north coast of california</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Buettner</title>
		<link>http://talkingtech.net/2006/02/16/balloon-tractk-controversy-hits-the-web/#comment-3176</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Buettner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 02:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkingtech.net/?p=61#comment-3176</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://balloontrackwatch.org/" rel="nofollow"&gt;BalloonTrackWatch.org&lt;/a&gt; is my site pure and simple. Not affiliated with any particular group. I started &lt;a href="http://lngwatch.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;LNGwatch.com&lt;/a&gt;in December of 03 with the intent of providing as much information on Calpine and LNG as I could. The intention being an informed public makes better decisions. Same for the Balloon Track issue and the new site.

It is difficult not to take a side and have it influence the content. But as with LNG I found the more hard data I found the more it solidified my position. Of course it works hand in hand. You tend to look for what you want. But in the end I think it still important to all to see what has happened elsewhere with similar issues and to understand the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://balloontrackwatch.org/" rel="nofollow">BalloonTrackWatch.org</a> is my site pure and simple. Not affiliated with any particular group. I started <a href="http://lngwatch.com/" rel="nofollow">LNGwatch.com</a>in December of 03 with the intent of providing as much information on Calpine and LNG as I could. The intention being an informed public makes better decisions. Same for the Balloon Track issue and the new site.</p>
<p>It is difficult not to take a side and have it influence the content. But as with LNG I found the more hard data I found the more it solidified my position. Of course it works hand in hand. You tend to look for what you want. But in the end I think it still important to all to see what has happened elsewhere with similar issues and to understand the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
