Comments on: Bill Proposed to Reverse Internet Radio Fee Hike http://talkingtech.net/2007/04/26/bill-proposed-to-reverse-internet-radio-fee-hike/ life and technology on the north coast of california Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:25:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Talking Tech » Blog Archive » Another Bill to Save Internet Radio http://talkingtech.net/2007/04/26/bill-proposed-to-reverse-internet-radio-fee-hike/comment-page-1/#comment-27513 Talking Tech » Blog Archive » Another Bill to Save Internet Radio Mon, 14 May 2007 15:34:20 +0000 http://talkingtech.net/2007/04/26/bill-proposed-to-reverse-internet-radio-fee-hike/#comment-27513 [...] Bill Proposed to Reverse Internet Radio Fee Hike [...] [...] Bill Proposed to Reverse Internet Radio Fee Hike [...]

]]> By: Gregg Foster http://talkingtech.net/2007/04/26/bill-proposed-to-reverse-internet-radio-fee-hike/comment-page-1/#comment-25286 Gregg Foster Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:37:56 +0000 http://talkingtech.net/2007/04/26/bill-proposed-to-reverse-internet-radio-fee-hike/#comment-25286 Here are the comments made by the author of the bill. INTERNET RADIO EQUITY ACT -- (Extensions of Remarks - April 26, 2007) SPEECH OF HON. JAY INSLEE OF WASHINGTON IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES THURSDAY, APRIL 26, 2007 Mr. INSLEE. Madam Speaker, on March 2, 2007, the Copyright Royalty Board (CRB), a three member panel affiliated with the Library of Congress, issued a decision that changed royalty expenses for commercial and noncommercial webcasters and will likely end Internet radio as we know it today. According to the decision, which is retroactive beginning January 1, 2006 and commences through December 31, 2010, commercial and noncommercial webcasters would be subject to an increase in royalty rates from $.08 in 2006 per performance to $.19 per performance in 2010. The new royalty rates amount to a 300 percent increase for the biggest webcasters and up to 1200 percent for small webcasters. For most web casters the royalties will exceed their gross revenues and bankrupt them. The CRB has refused to reconsider its decision so the higher royalties--including retroactive royalties back to January 2006--are due May 15, 2007. My fear is that these new rates will decimate Internet radio and 70 million Americans that listen to Internet radio every month will no longer have access to this music service. For these reasons, I have introduced the Internet Radio Equality Act which provides royalty parity for Internet radio providers. The bill vacates the CRB's March 2nd decision and changes the royalty rate-setting standard that applies to commercial Internet radio royalty arbitrations so that it is the same standard that applies to satellite radio, cable radio, jukeboxes, and record companies (when they are licensees of songwriters). The bill also sets a transition rate through 2010 that is the same royalty rate that satellite radio services pay (7.5 percent of revenue). Finally, the bill expands the Copyright Act's Section 118 musical work license for noncommercial broadcasters like National Public Radio to enable those broadcasters to also perform sound recordings over Internet radio at royalty rates designed for noncommercial entities. I believe strongly that it is the responsibility of Congress to promote media diversity in all areas including web-based broadcasting and to ensure affordable consumer access to Internet media. Here are the comments made by the author of the bill.

INTERNET RADIO EQUITY ACT — (Extensions of Remarks - April 26, 2007)

SPEECH OF HON. JAY INSLEE OF WASHINGTON IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
THURSDAY, APRIL 26, 2007
Mr. INSLEE. Madam Speaker, on March 2, 2007, the Copyright Royalty Board (CRB), a three member panel affiliated with the Library of Congress, issued a decision that changed royalty expenses for commercial and noncommercial webcasters and will likely end Internet radio as we know it today. According to the decision, which is retroactive beginning January 1, 2006 and commences through December 31, 2010, commercial and noncommercial webcasters would be subject to an increase in royalty rates from $.08 in 2006 per performance to $.19 per performance in 2010. The new royalty rates amount to a 300 percent increase for the biggest webcasters and up to 1200 percent for small webcasters. For most web casters the royalties will exceed their gross revenues and bankrupt them. The CRB has refused to reconsider its decision so the higher royalties–including retroactive royalties back to January 2006–are due May 15, 2007. My fear is that these new rates will decimate Internet radio and 70 million Americans that listen to Internet radio every month will no longer have access to this music service.

For these reasons, I have introduced the Internet Radio Equality Act which provides royalty parity for Internet radio providers. The bill vacates the CRB’s March 2nd decision and changes the royalty rate-setting standard that applies to commercial Internet radio royalty arbitrations so that it is the same standard that applies to satellite radio, cable radio, jukeboxes, and record companies (when they are licensees of songwriters). The bill also sets a transition rate through 2010 that is the same royalty rate that satellite radio services pay (7.5 percent of revenue). Finally, the bill expands the Copyright Act’s Section 118 musical work license for noncommercial broadcasters like National Public Radio to enable those broadcasters to also perform sound recordings over Internet radio at royalty rates designed for noncommercial entities.

I believe strongly that it is the responsibility of Congress to promote media diversity in all areas including web-based broadcasting and to ensure affordable consumer access to Internet media.

]]> By: Jay Koster http://talkingtech.net/2007/04/26/bill-proposed-to-reverse-internet-radio-fee-hike/comment-page-1/#comment-25056 Jay Koster Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:18:59 +0000 http://talkingtech.net/2007/04/26/bill-proposed-to-reverse-internet-radio-fee-hike/#comment-25056 Ooh. This is good news, if it passes. Ooh.

This is good news, if it passes.

]]>