<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fast Internet for All Slows to Crawl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://talkingtech.net/2009/10/30/fast-internet-for-all-slows-to-crawl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://talkingtech.net/2009/10/30/fast-internet-for-all-slows-to-crawl/</link>
	<description>life and technology on the north coast of california</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:47:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fiber Route</title>
		<link>http://talkingtech.net/2009/10/30/fast-internet-for-all-slows-to-crawl/comment-page-1/#comment-35292</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiber Route</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkingtech.net/?p=890#comment-35292</guid>
		<description>Any updates on this? I&#039;d like to hear what&#039;s been going on since...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any updates on this? I&#8217;d like to hear what&#8217;s been going on since&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://talkingtech.net/2009/10/30/fast-internet-for-all-slows-to-crawl/comment-page-1/#comment-33244</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkingtech.net/?p=890#comment-33244</guid>
		<description>Seth is doing a great job in the rural parts of the county. And microwave would be an acceptable alternative to redunancy in the short term. But I don&#039;t believe either solves long term bandwidth and stability issues and that&#039;s what most of the proposals are focused on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth is doing a great job in the rural parts of the county. And microwave would be an acceptable alternative to redunancy in the short term. But I don&#8217;t believe either solves long term bandwidth and stability issues and that&#8217;s what most of the proposals are focused on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sys RQ</title>
		<link>http://talkingtech.net/2009/10/30/fast-internet-for-all-slows-to-crawl/comment-page-1/#comment-33173</link>
		<dc:creator>Sys RQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkingtech.net/?p=890#comment-33173</guid>
		<description>Out in the country, the best things come homegrown.

I don&#039;t want to sound like an advertisement, but Netlink 101&#039;s microwave service beats the pants off of Suddenstink for stability. As some of us are aware of from an unfortunate outage earlier this decade, the only event that can significantly disrupt a long-range wireless network is a forest fire. Fiber networks - as we have witnessed many times since we&#039;ve had one - are fragile and can take many days to fix once compromised.

We don&#039;t have time to complain and wait for better fiber networks to be installed. Wireless technology is surprisingly cheap and available now. $2,000 will buy 50 miles of uninterrupted microwave communication. That&#039;s cheaper than the physical &quot;wire&quot; needed to run a single-mode fiber connection, not to mention the installation costs.

I agree that we need unity when it comes to which path to take as far as a secondary fiber route... if it ever comes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out in the country, the best things come homegrown.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to sound like an advertisement, but Netlink 101&#8242;s microwave service beats the pants off of Suddenstink for stability. As some of us are aware of from an unfortunate outage earlier this decade, the only event that can significantly disrupt a long-range wireless network is a forest fire. Fiber networks &#8211; as we have witnessed many times since we&#8217;ve had one &#8211; are fragile and can take many days to fix once compromised.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t have time to complain and wait for better fiber networks to be installed. Wireless technology is surprisingly cheap and available now. $2,000 will buy 50 miles of uninterrupted microwave communication. That&#8217;s cheaper than the physical &#8220;wire&#8221; needed to run a single-mode fiber connection, not to mention the installation costs.</p>
<p>I agree that we need unity when it comes to which path to take as far as a secondary fiber route&#8230; if it ever comes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

