<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FCC Looks at Barely Adequate Speeds for Rural Broadband</title>
	<atom:link href="http://talkingtech.net/2009/12/21/fcc-looks-at-barely-adequate-speeds-for-rural-broadband/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://talkingtech.net/2009/12/21/fcc-looks-at-barely-adequate-speeds-for-rural-broadband/</link>
	<description>life and technology on the north coast of california</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:43:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ï»¿island vacation</title>
		<link>http://talkingtech.net/2009/12/21/fcc-looks-at-barely-adequate-speeds-for-rural-broadband/comment-page-1/#comment-35042</link>
		<dc:creator>ï»¿island vacation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkingtech.net/?p=927#comment-35042</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.islandeyepeice.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;island vacation &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.islandeyepeice.com/" rel="nofollow">island vacation </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G_B_Chew</title>
		<link>http://talkingtech.net/2009/12/21/fcc-looks-at-barely-adequate-speeds-for-rural-broadband/comment-page-1/#comment-34637</link>
		<dc:creator>G_B_Chew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkingtech.net/?p=927#comment-34637</guid>
		<description>Reading this, I&#039;m reminded of my old 1200 bps external modem, and AOL billing by the hour.  It&#039;s been interesting to watch the changes, but I can&#039;t help wondering if &quot;barely adequate speeds&quot; really means what we think it means.

I&#039;m certainly enamored of my current 1 mbps-down cable connection, and when it goes out, as it&#039;s wont to do, I feel the digital equivalent of phantom-limb syndrome.

I wonder what would happen if I went back to dial up?  Of course then I&#039;d need a land line phone, which I haven&#039;t had in years...cellular revolution and all that.

How times change. Will we even recognize the networks that out grandchildren create?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading this, I&#8217;m reminded of my old 1200 bps external modem, and AOL billing by the hour.  It&#8217;s been interesting to watch the changes, but I can&#8217;t help wondering if &#8220;barely adequate speeds&#8221; really means what we think it means.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m certainly enamored of my current 1 mbps-down cable connection, and when it goes out, as it&#8217;s wont to do, I feel the digital equivalent of phantom-limb syndrome.</p>
<p>I wonder what would happen if I went back to dial up?  Of course then I&#8217;d need a land line phone, which I haven&#8217;t had in years&#8230;cellular revolution and all that.</p>
<p>How times change. Will we even recognize the networks that out grandchildren create?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emilia Palmer</title>
		<link>http://talkingtech.net/2009/12/21/fcc-looks-at-barely-adequate-speeds-for-rural-broadband/comment-page-1/#comment-33662</link>
		<dc:creator>Emilia Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkingtech.net/?p=927#comment-33662</guid>
		<description>broadband internet these days are dirt cheap, there are more and more broadband companies offering cheap service too:&#039;&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>broadband internet these days are dirt cheap, there are more and more broadband companies offering cheap service too:&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

